>>3661519really like these! studio shots are something that intrigue me, but I am not sure if I have the vision!
>>3661500as everyone else said, really good job keeping to your strengths
>>3661526I like a lot. Since you are asking for advice, the best I can muster is your use of white bg with some of the outfits causes contrast problems for me. Editing seems fine tho
>>3661710great architecture shots
>>3661758interesting mix of color with landscapes. not a fan of the shallow dof on the midroad shot.
>>3661999I like the color triplets you have going on.
>>3664389kinda safe and boring. Not many subjects to gawk at.
>>3664408I get the layout to separate the color pallets you have, and I like the actual pictures. Yet for some reason it gives me an empty feeling. Still gonna follow though!
>>3665085Looks like you were just in AZ, like I! Way to get down to the canyons. Good pics overall, but the river (2nd from top on the left) is uninteresting.
>>3669691feel a little cluttered, yet I respect your obvious love for human interaction.
>>3670017looks like you over edit a lot of these. having similar pics next to each other doesn't help either. I like the content overall.
>>3678136always jealous of some nice, not over-sexualized portraits. I do not have the adequate networking to do so...
A lot of you are so secure in what your lane is! Makes me a little upset I do not have a consistent "style" yet... Started photography new year 2020 in Colombia with a Canon Rebel T3 (hence the handle). Would appreciate any pointers on what stands out as personal strengths and weaknesses.
@t3phoenix
