>>3346672Return that shit anon. You can literally get an APS-C camera with a lens for under $200 used. Pic related is in AUD and it's equivalent to about $140. It's going to be old and shitty but still a thousand times better than the garbage you just bought. As
>>3347018 pointed out, the image quality is going to be smartphone tier or potentially even worse.
Buy a q666 tripod off ebay or aliexpress for $50, some chink flash for $30, a diffuser for $8, a remote for $5 and an SD card for like $20. Learn the exposure triangle, download lightroom, watch some tutorials, always shoot raw and don't touch the global saturation and vibrance sliders, always use HSL. Then shoot until you save up enough money to upgrade your gear. A better camera won't magically make your photos better, but it's near impossible to get anything usable out of a 1/2.3" sensor.
