>>3055132This photo sucks. If you want to try to salvage anything from it, crop out half or more of the sky, make it black and white and grainy, turn up contrast and you will have something that at least evokes emotion in hipsters. But better idea, shoot a subject that isn't so boring.
>>3055183Great image quality but I can't really tell what I'm looking at. If it was more clever you'd be on to something but as it is, it's kind of a cheap effect that makes me feel I wasted m time trying to see what I'm looking at.
>>3055181See above, except not the image quality part.
>>3055180I like the framing of the house, but that doesn't save this from being a dull image to me. Maybe if there was some depth to the wheat, or if it were sharper, it would be more eyecatching. The birds also should ideally be entirely in the image, as it is it's a little off having half of two birds in the frame.
Appreciate any thoughts on my own photo, especially post-processing, which was a very different process on this image than on most for me.
