>>3258932Here's one of t he results. Same wasp eye as
>>3258754 but this is at just over 61.5:1 I really don't think I could do much better with this lens and setup. This is the only image I could get without motion blur. While this is fun and ridiculous, I'm better off spending $40 or so on ebay and getting an actual microscope lens for the camera at this point. While the DOF is spot on in this image, the DOF itself is blurry/fuzzy at this level of extremism macro.
I don't have anything to take a photo of in order to be able to relate to the sizes seen in the photo. With the single tube I could measure the stick pin in
>>3258774 and calculate it easily. I'm sure I could do something with pixel count and knowing the 61.5:1, but I need to research that a bit. Maybe tomorrow.
