>>4341917>Yes, it's science. But camera's bayer is interpreted by math, and eyes-by a neural network. Neural network can fill in the gaps in data, math can'tFirst: you are a retard. Math absolutely can fill in gaps. Math fills in the gaps all the time across countless domains. In fact, math can be used to model neural networks to fill in the gaps that way, which is what we call AI.
Second: the gaps are SMALLER with Bayer. Whether Bayer or film you only get so close to the exact wavelengths that constituted a color. But with Bayer you provably get closer than with density dithering of 3-4 industrial dyes.
>Because faggots like you can't scan for shit.LOL it was all over the place long before scanners.
>And? LolAnd that means you can never precisely nail down what the exact color should be on neg film. It's an unknown variable reducing the color precision of the medium.
>Yea, because my friend's lab stores all film in the fridge by defaultYou want me to believe this now? You can't even find a data sheet, but your friend has a lab and you TOTALLY shoot refrigerated film.
>Nice strawmanIt was literally what you said.
>Aight, show me the paragraph in fuji's datasheets where fuji states>>At real world contrast levels Velvia 50 hits 80 lp/mmPic related, page 7 of the data sheet.
>and while we're at it, show me the definition of "real world contrast" in that same datasheetSame pic.
>Im not even going to ask you to show the rest of your statements in the datasheets, because both you and I know that there's nothing like that in thereThe characteristic curve giving you the dynamic range of Velvia 50 is on page 8. Want a screenshot?
>Anon, are you a boomer?I notice you didn't tell me I'm wrong.
