>>4229795Here it is. So I have some questions. Does this look like a light leak or development problem? I had the EXACT same results on a roll of ilford 3200 that was pushed to 6500. However I used a different film back. This is tori-x pushed to 1600 on a different film back (granted I’ve never used this film back before) yet the results are the exact same. Do you think it’s a light leak or development issue?
I recently sent some slower iso film (although shot in full daylight) to be developed and there were no obvious light leaks.
>can someone post this inverted pls 