>>3013028>35mm=35 megapixelsThat's a vast overestimation.
I scanned lots of different film through various means and I've never seen anything approaching D800 levels of detail on a single 35mm frame. Maybe B&W technical film can do that, but it's unusable for general photography.
Do note that it's very hard to compare film to digital as film resolution varies depending on contrast.
The best I've seen so far was Provia, probably a 20 MP equivalent at most, and that's expensive and slow slide film. Your run of the mill ISO 200 consumer film ceases to improve beyond 2400 dpi (unless you mistake grain for detail), that's 8 MP per frame. At higher sensitivities, it goes downhill fast - Superia 800 is already a mess at pixel level at 1600 dpi.
On the digital side, even cheapo micro4/3 cameras are now 20 MP and don't lose much quality up to ISO 800 at least.
>film's massive dymanic range That's a meme. Film still has a gentler highlight roll-off, but modern digital has a big advantage in shadow detail. Expose correctly and you'll get more from digital - and if it's not enough, you can always try multi-shot techniques.
