>>3450404>thirty-six views of the Gateway Arch>>3450408It looks like there's a monkey on fire in the upper left corner (((=
>>3452826The posters coming out of his head might say this person has been places.
>>3453777I'm still unsure if you're a troll or if you have real problems. The photo is really terrible. If you wanted to show warmness you could have photographed your bed.
>>3456296It's a good submission. I guess showing the contrast with the more modern setting was your way to untouristify the photo. It's alright.
>>3456297It's nice. I like how there's a line coming out of the empty lower right corner. In the thumbnail I can see there's a light streak leading to the mid-stride man. Cool.
>>3457310acresponds.jpg
>>3459534I don't get it. What's the relation between the landmark and a pair of scissors?
>>3460865Breaking Bad? I see you took it from a diagonal point of view, but the concrete thingies still look like they're in rows parallel to the photo. Added to the horizon in the middle it gives the photo a static feel, which I personally dislike. The abstract subject goes very well with the experimental exp and dev, you could try to make a series using wide angles or some other gizmo.
>>3462350It's very messy. It looks like it's layered, like an onion; the branches and some other elements in the photo subdivide it in smoke, man with fire, patch of green, patch of dirt, patch of dirt with chickens. Dunno mate.
>>3462538Newmex, I always have the impression in your portraits you either include too much or too little. Usually you include too much, like dirty napkins on a table or a row of empty benches. In this case it's too little: I see no indication of where these people are or what they're up to.
>>3462685Nice catto. You could get lower and show some environment in addition to the cracked pavement. Right now it looks very snapshotty.
>person from my hometown