>>3771796why do you keep on posting ads for cine lenses as if their marked up price tags is any way indicative of anything other than market collusion. sigma's 18-35 f/1.8 for a DSLR is like $700, the cine version is like $4k, and they have the same optics in them. also by not posting things that you actually own, all you're doing is continuing to prove how poor you are.
>>3771798the ugly swirly bokeh?