Quoted By:
Newbie here, picked up a Canon M50 with a EF-M 15-45MM lens. Been playing with it for a bit and it seems fine, alright zoom and all that, quality is pretty sharp unless I zoom all the way in, though people tell me it's shit and I should buy different ones. Question is I don't really understand the differences. Why wouldn't you just get one that had the most range on it to cover all bases?
Instead the most highly recommended so far was a 22M, yet they also sell 32, 18-150, 11-22, 28, and 55-200. I'm guessing they're all more specialized for different things, like low light/indoor, portait or landscape, or stuff like that, but again I don't see why you wouldn't just buy the one with the most range/zoom. Is the quality drop-off between that and a narrower range really that much better?
If anyone wanted to spell it out cliff's notes style that'd be grand. Or an EF-M lens recommendation, though the 22M seems to be the one to go for. Thanks much.
