>>3334769My personal favorite are the retards that complain when you photograph buildings or scenery without anybody in the photo at all. I won’t photograph somebody who doesn’t want to be photographed, but come the fuck on I don’t give a flying fuck if you don’t want a building photographed, you’re not even in that photograph you fucking moron, now kindly fuck off.
Now when I want to photograph buildings I do so on the weekend or in the evening after the build is closed and nobody is around. So far I haven’t had anybody complain about it, but I’ll bet the retards that complained about me photographing the building will raise a stink about if they knew I photographed the building after they left and went home for the way.
I can understand why people would not want their photograph taken, but why the fuck would anybody whose not mentally retarded care if I photograph a building or some other scene that has no people in it.
Did any other anons get yelled at by retards for photographing a building or landscape that has no people in it, or am I the only photograph to meet that kind of moron.
Pic related: this is an example of the type of photograph that I’m talking about, where people bitched at me for taking a photograph with no humans in it, just some buildings and animals; it’s subject is some ducks near a house that I took to test out a new nifty-fifty I got for my DSLR.