>>3746874In theory EVFs are great. But they are the poster child for “great for technical statfags on paper, but actually shitty in real life”.
EVFs
>eat battery>have shitty frame rates especially in low light>have washed out colors>are soullessIt’s like having a real gf (OVF) vs a fake hologram one (EVF). Why would I want to look at the world through a computer’s shitty interpretation of it?
>inb4 U HAVENT USED THE LATEST EVF TECH BROOO!!!Yes, I have. From Sony and Canon. $2K+ bodies. They both suck compared to OVF. But I deal with it because everything else about mirrorless is, in fact, superior.
