>>2843031Your entire argument is contingent on an extreme definition of "dim light" that no other photographer uses. It's impossible to argue with directly because you've set your goalposts so high that the only way we can approach it is to go after said goalposts.
Dim light does not equal a lack of contrast. Here's a photo shot well over an hour after sunset, in the mountains away from artificial lighting. I had to use a flashlight to focus, and ISO 1600 just to get a decent exposure at f/2 and 25 seconds. As you can see, there's plenty of contrast.
>>2843035You said it in response to a direct quote about the photo I posted, not in response to my comment about ISO 800? How was I supposed to read your mind and figure out that you were talking about another thing I said and not the thing you quoted?
A lack of ability to comprehend that other people don't know what you're thinking is a common indication of autism.
