>>3913979Because i'm not only about dem snowflakes and trying to appear perfect.
I take photos that are often crap, sometimes really crap, but idgaf if i still find them appealing in some way, or if the person in them expects to see the photo they know i took.
And sometimes a shot or two that I could have culled slips past because i didnt decide between it and the one next to it as i speed processed and shotgun published them to oh-hi.
>>3913983You didn't. I just find labels, artist statements, categories and pretty much the entire state-of-being of other photographers and they way they talk cringey as fuck.
>>3914062No.
I've never watched that, and barely even know the reference aside from an image of some long haired dude i see in memes.
I wouldn't derive something like a domain name from someone elses broadcast intellectual property either, that would be dumb, and totally not how i roll anyway. The cult of celebrity and fanboyism can go fuck itself.
It's something my internet waifu used to say in SL.
"Oh hi, i like your face"
...and it was available, short, very accurately describes what I'm thinking when i'm doing it, and easy for people to remember.
