>>43624908x10 film still does better than any digital sensor in 2024. If you want to get close you have to spend an absolute assload of money and the camera still takes a very high level of technical proficiency(slow) to obtain maximum quality images.
Why do digitoids always compare inferior formats instead of the truest format of film, 8x10? Just curious. In all honesty I could care less because contact printing my 8x10 sheets produces IQ and prints so beautiful I simply do not care for anything more and only utilize less for my own convenience.
Also look at this real world image that is sort of like a line chart. This is around a 1/60th crop of the whole negative, unsharpened. Poorly scanned at 2400dpi, but it is a full resolution jpeg.
