>>3286493Thanks man, I liked the picture you mentioned very much at first but in hindsight it felt very overprocessed. Glad you like it.
>Is this all shot on an a6000?Yup. Up until
>>3270874 everything was done with the 1850 kit lens - which is pretty fucking shitty I can tell now.
After that, I used a Neewer 35 mm and love it so far.
Pic related was done with a Minolta MD 35-105, which is even more fun even though it has some light issues.
I can't say anything about Canon but I can say that I think the a6000 is an amazing, versatile camera. If I had the money, though, I'd rather go for a full frame to make full use of the vintage lenses I have recently acquired.