>>3390559>You can take the 70-210 f4 Poor Man's L from 1987, push-pull motion and impaled screeching rabbit AF and all, and mount it to whatever the most expensive and newest Canon FF offering is right now, and it will 100 percent work.Yes
>>3390562>Not vastly superior MinoltaI don't know about their optics, but they had some shitty mechanics.
I also think every Canon lens will work with every Canon body. The only incompatibility I know of is with the MkIII extenders and the oldest 35mm bodies.
>>3390551>So the canon is better overall?I'd say so; but Sugarbear is right, it's what YOU like that's "best."
Canon's do have objectively better build quality though.
