Quoted By:
ok /p/, I need your help
I will buy my first good camera soon, but I am having trouble choosing between the brands.
First off, Im a film student of 2 years, I already have a fairly good idea of how exposure, composition, lighting and story of an image work.
Until now I have been focusing on directing, screenplay and animation, so now i want to expand into cinematography and photography.
I dont want an "entry"-leve camera, as I dont really need to figure out the basics anymore. I've been shooting most of my uni material on different Eos C models(mostly c500) and a little bit on a RED.
When it comes to photography though, I'm still a little clueless what to choose. I dont have the money for 2k+ full frame shenanigans, so I'd go with a prosumer camera. Body for ~1k and another 500 for some decent glass.
Best candidates for me are Canon 80d, Nikon D7200 and Sony A6300.
I've read all tests and reviews there are to read, so I am not really looking for spec tips here. I just want to figure out in what company I want to invest, based on how their images "feel".
I am aware that this is a weird request, but I want to hear your opinions on how the different cameras affect the look and feel of an image.
Bc I have the impression that most of the images produced by Canon models evoke a "cinematic" feel (pic related). Ive seen pictures from amateurs that really told a story just by how the color chemistry works.
From Nikon I've seen incredible results when it comes to wildlife and documentation. They tend to be more precise than Canon images.
Sony on the other hand leaves an almost machine like taste for me. Especially on their mirrorless models, everything seems to be so outstandingly sharp and well lit, that it almost feels superficial to me. Idk.
I am completely open for buying any of them. Just leave your opinon and maybe a picture to go with it and prove your point.
>TL;DR Canon VS Nikon VS Sony based on how their images feel.
