>>3734565also, later vs. earlier canikons dont differ that much in terms of quality, thats on lens/film/scan/print combo. you get better ergonomics, still available spares, bells and whistles.
>>3734579>No one ITTdude. yet. and you know it. i want to dump as much info on OP before the gearfags arrive.
op, its your call-
>"cheap" MF camera, expensive lenses with limited availability, more pricey per frame 120 film, cheap scanner. >35mm, can be cheap or expensive, shitton of lenses, "cheaper" per frame (depends on stock), not as "professional", expensive scanner. 