>>2711581> If it doesn't, is it worth just getting the mark ii or saving that extra 1k for the iii?The mark II is shit in terms of AF and more, I simply wouldn't buy it. (Seriously, don't! Pic related.)
The mark III is okay, on that one I would say it's mainly a consideration if you don't want a Sony A7(R/S) II or Nikon (D750, D810, whatever) instead.
