>>4187831>Still didn't name the photographers whose names actually matterwhat does that have to do with anything or with any of the conversations going on in the thread? are you cognitively impaired?
but since you're being such an insufferable cunt, here's a couple names so you can cherry pick one or two that YOU think are not good and completely change the subject and try to twist the argument to your advantage because subconsciously you know you are wrong, you now that sigma lenses are shit and you know that nobody whose name means anything uses these shitty ''muh sharpness and bokeh!!'' lenses, so here's some names; Robert Richardson, Rodrigo Prieto, Riccardo Spatolisano, Roger Deakins, Michael Muller, Gordon Willis, Sails Chong, Paul Reiffer, Simon Puschmann, Yulia Gorbachenko, Ed Lachman, Bella Kotak, Chung-hoon Chung, Gian Paul Lozza, Geoff Ang, Peter Coulson, Tim Flach, Morten Hilmer, Peter Lindbergh, Max Thompson, Jason Bassett, Bruno Massao, Quentin Caffier, Chris Doyle, Greig Fraser, Hoyte Van Hoytema, Chris Bilodeau, Justin Chung, Gemmy Woud, Jeff Berlin and many, many, many more...
no fucking body who cares about their photos and look, will use lenses from sigma or similar manufacturers. even most of your so called ''professionals'' will just stick to native manufacturer lenses and even if they use 3rd party lenses its usually from zeiss, voigtlander, mitakon or some random vintage manufacturer. even those fucking pixel peeping, gearfagging baboons and lens review channel owners, even they will praise shitma or shityang on their videos but if they actually do photography for work and if you look at what they actually use when working, its rarely sigma lenses even for these retards, most of them just use native canikonsnoy lenses or other 3rd part lenses that are actually good or just straight up go full hipster mode and own 10 leica bodies and 30 leica lenses.
again, no actual photographer whose name and work mean something, fucking uses shitma
