>>3328591You haven't done it with the phone i'm using.
And not with NATURAL STARLIGHT lmao.
I mean, this is unnatural starlight.
The conclusion i have to make from this is that it is many bright objects flying in synchronicity at high velocity,
I can provide evidence that the exposure was not longer than 1 second. Other than that, i would agree that it looks like shutter drag, but i can guarantee you that it wasn't. But to explain it to you is more difficult than obtaining a camera and taking video of ufos and the crazy shit they do.
>lol yeah green thing is lens flare.Trust me, it took me way too long to figure that out. Kinda smacked myself in the face with it lol.
>I've used a Q-tip before. HAH. Ok, pic related. I thought i was absolutely a moron for trying to use a q-tip and well, it's comforting to know other people would go through the same trains of thought.
Microfiber you say :)
I know i can't convince you that it isn't shutter drag provided the evidence i've given. What i am saying though, is that it was not shutter drag. I agree that it looks as such, but i've tried light painting in the past and with a phone i could never emulate these results.
Also, notice that not all the lines are parallel. I would have had to make some weird motion to had emulated this effect.
And from what light source? Think about it. These is against a black background. I.E: the night sky. There's nothing else in the frame that could account for this other than stars, but my phone can't record starlight with its pos sensor.
If it was street lights we'd see more exposure. Are you suggesting i had somehow fabricated a scene and carefully painted this with SOMEHOW a bulbed exposure? Because i'm sure this phone can not do bulbed exposures...
That being said,
You say the FX G AF-S (damn nikon why u so complicated) 50mm 1.4 is good with the D5500?
No vignetting on DX body? And will make a good transition to FX in the future?
No downsides??
