>>3621624>Those ancient EF lenses don't have the resolving power for modern sensorsThe fuck are you talking about? Plenty of EF lenses are good on 50+mp FF sensors, including basically all L glass released from just before the 5Ds/sR until now, and even some L glass and some primes from the 2000's. The EF lenses that an R5 buyer would likely buy and adapt are probably good to >100mp.
>>3621626>1 stop DR vs 5+? Look at how bad the RP RAWs are to push/pull.Spoken like someone who has never touched an RP RAW. It's not a Sony, but you can push 3ev with a little NR and prints will be fine. (Screenshot is at 1:1 where noise is emphasized.)
>>3621626>If the RP could at least match the APS-C sensors then there's a discussion to be had.Better sharpness and high ISO, DR will depend on what sensor you're comparing it to because sensor size really doesn't impact DR.
