>>4076866>How dare you mention that crop lenses can still be used on full frame to someone with crop gear considering going full frameIt was dishonest shilling on your part, specially considering that as long as he stayed on APS-C glass anything but a a7RIV or a fpL would be a downgrade.
>>You don't need more than 8mp to fill anyone's screen pixel perfectYet you were arguing for resolution just a few posts up
>Yet you're whining that half of a 24mp FF camera is somehow insufficient?I'm arguing it's a downgrade compared to all of a 24MP APS-C camera.
>>Implying every lens isn't designed for digital for at least the last 20 yearslel, if that were the case vignetting wouldn't be so horrid. FT and MFT specify the design must be telecentric.
>??? Then why does an f1.4 lens cost so much more than an f2 lens? And why are faster lenses so popular?Because the glass elements are larger, correcting aberrations is more challenging, there's a demand for the thinner DoF and last but not least you're full of shit.
You can get a f/0.95 50mm for Nikon Z for $689. Meanwhile the 1.2S costs $2096.
>False but I refuse to elaborate because I can'tNo, because it's self-evident. Only now the latest and most expensive Canons can match Micro Four Thirds in terms of IBIS, for example. For years MFT was the only game in town for as many stops as they had. Now they're tied at 8 stops. Everyone other than Canon and Olympus is inferior in this aspect.
>Lol, there it is, you're just mad that someone else is buying nicer things than you, yet againOP said he doesn't want to spend money getting new glass.
>>My Olympus is from 2009lol, I shoot full frame, both digital and film. I posted that example to illustrate how ridiculous you're being.
