>>4349327I have not found any artifact across all pictures that matches the missing layer. But i do know now that the 5 euro camera works in its entire capacity. Picrel is what a probably overdeveloped and shitly scanned image looks like after tweaking the brightness and contrast in gimp. The original has extremely blown out highlights so on my new camera i used the same film but slightly underexposed it, does stand developing make sense? I have rodinal and enough ilford rapid fixer to mix up a 90% fresh solution, i have had good experiences with reusing it also.
