>>3737699Normally I'm not fond of getting involved in the juvenile spats people have here. That said, shit like
> i feel really flattered that it seems that im the only one on /p/ that can get girls naked for free, and you incel seething starts to feel like a compliment to my social skillsis ridiculous to say. I'm not very fond of sexualizing photos because I feel that arousal is a cheap emotion. Although people have been making commentary about my photos being Lynchian, my ultimate goal is to cast a more Sherman-esque vibe of subtle uncanniness; artificiality, implacable discomfort and surreality. "Sexy" is something that, though perhaps like other forms, in being difficult to achieve perfection with, has a low bar of entry, because most people are easily swayed by nudity, particularly when the subject is relatively conventionally attractive. Prospective models have occasionally disappointed me by requesting, or insisting, on taking "boudoir" or nude photos. It hasn't happened very often to me, however it has still caused inconvenience. I have a hard enough time as it is, since most of my models have had a negative reaction to the product, regardless of whether they had seen my previous photos, and subsequently do not return. Gloating that some random woman will get naked for you is not impressive. There are reasons to be uninterested in sexualizing photography that have nothing to with incels; virginity, jealousy, etc. This is on the same level of bluster as bragging that you fuck your models. Who gives a shit? I find it all to be really distasteful behaviour. Have one of my most poorly-focused duds.
