>>3248330In that sense it could be possible, and if that's the case then I would be impressed. But I've mainly been doing what
>>3248338 said, the comparisons. I guess to me, digital files just look too "clean."
So far, I'm coming away with how film interacts with light; whites and highlights when overexposed -
>>3248107 and a costly and time consuming method to emulate an organic grain structure -
>>3248032Pic related, actual high resolution film scan. Tmax 400, grain is so pronounced and contrasty, but very smooth.