>>3933907>>>3933877(You)>>this guy asked!>replies to this guy >>3933654>kekw.emojiYou know I already answered him, right? That's why the conversation happened. You just didn't read it, so you needed a hotlink back up to where he asked it.
I don't think anyone but you could be confused by that.
>I'd rather be a gambling addict drunk than an unemployed trannyTell us about your work life, what's it like? :^)
>>I'm practically black and it's got nothing to do with sub-bathing>then why you got pasty ass tan lines lmaoI never claimed to be practically black. I said Indya Moore and I have roughly the same non-tanned skin color. Race isn't just skin color, it's how your skin *reacts* to the sun.
Would you be responding the same if I were talking about my Welsh ancestors? Would you have the same amount of doubt and incredulence?
I really don't think you would, and that's funny, because I'm only like 1/256th Welsh, if we're applying the same rules of "blood" that you seem to think are required to acknowledge my ancestry.
I don't care about tribal enrollments or any of that bureaucratic shit. That's a different level of things, called politics, entirely seperate from traceable family histories.
Europeans don't have a patent on writing each other out of history. Sometimes you write yourself out or into the margins for safety from the very bureaucrats future generations consider the arbiters of truth.
Of course, being just as educated on European history as I am American, I know that the fretting anglo aspect of the equation is tied to something much simpler; the cock of Rome and the erasure of your own identities.
Thankfully, the Welsh still remember, even if we mock their language :^)
