>>2951611>>2951566I disagree. We've got insane amounts of spillover normies from the site boost.
People who'd usually be found on
photo.net,
dpreview.com and rumour sites now see this as a place to discuss cameras anonymously. They want to argue about gear online and prove people wrong but they think it's a good idea to do it outside the gear thread. They're the type of flawed humans who believe absolutely everything is objective and must be measured as objective. Instead of accepting that people like to do different tools and have different preferences, they instead can't handle that people have opinions. If you don't use this precise lens because X reviewer uses it or Y chart shows this result or because Z I like it then you're fucking wrong!
Worse is that now there's an IP count on pages, you can see that it's usually the same one or two people arguing over inane shit.
>>2951145>>2951159>>2951204This is a good example of this, as the second post linked is to a Leica, yet they'll stop hop onto Sony or Fuji at any point to bait people. The same fucking people constantly fall for the obvious bait every time.
Who knows why they do it. They're either paid or are extreme fanboys with disgusting brand loyalty and buyers remorse. The only solace you'll get from it is that the genetic waste who argues over shit like this is probably unlikely to have a child. If they do have a child, there's always the hope that their spawn will die.
