>>2706847>f4.5 taking lens>1/125 max shutter speedWait, what, how can this be a downgrade of the original L166s. Literally how. It's like if Lomography sold stones they'd be somehow brittle and water-soluble while sporting the x20 price tag. Bloody hell.
>>2706762Nigga fifty bucks is still five times too much.
On the subject if you're already investing in toy entry-level TLRs why ship soviet era trash when you've so much cold war era trash of your own for literally nothing, I'll never understand that. Pic obviously related.
