>>4371993The funny part is he literally tried to give the film a disadvantage by scaling it down
See these little gaps in the cobweb/twig thing? Those are line pairs. See how they don't exist in his downscaled film? He scaled the film down, losing resolution, so he could claim film has less resolution.
Just so he could accidentally prove that even with an artificial disadvantage, the cheapest 35mm negative ran through a soviet shitbox actually looks as good a $1400 50mp FF DSLR+Professional zoom if you have the skills and equipment to enlarge it correctly.