>>3841416To backup what I'm saying a bit, compare ISO noise (a7iii on top at 25,600, a7ii below at the same ISO)
Then take into account you get twice as many shots on the iii on a single battery (710 vs 350), 693 AF points vs 117, double the burst rate, better IBIS, better dynamic range.
In your first post you said you wanted better IBIS and low light, I'm not sure about the IBIS but the low light on the a6300 is barely worse than the a7ii
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_a6300&attr13_1=sony_a7ii&attr13_2=sony_a7iii&attr13_3=sony_a7riv&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=6400&attr16_1=6400&attr16_2=6400&attr16_3=6400&attr126_3=1&attr171_0=1&normalization=compare&widget=1&x=0&y=0 