>>4310835That looks cool and all but there ain't no way I'm touching sepples if I'm not getting paid for it. I got it to the point I'm calling it "good enough" by faking it. Each image basically gets a mask with a wavy/jagged edge and then I just layer them on top of each other with the calculated pixel offsets based off the printer coordinates. You can see where it doesn't quite line up as little blurry patches or jagged lines, like along the border, but mostly it is not noticeable. I'm gonna get some bubble levels to try and get the camera more flat to the film to minimize that.
>>4310482That's a shame. All the other ones are more expensive and most can't do 6x12+. I'm using the epson flatbed holder but getting the film into it sucks ass.
Here's a full rez scan. Unrelated to the scan, I need a better viewfinder for my camera so I can quit chopping the top off things.
