Your pics look like pic related, it's what happens when people people fall for the wide angle meme and desperately try to search for "foreground interest", then pick some random garbage that only detracts from the main subject
>>3682523cliche, everyone has done it and better than you have (e.g., bridge is distracting framing)
>>3682524>instagram snapshit>>3682526no clear subject
use longer lens or crop top and bottom to fill frame with mountain and farms
>>3682527again, too much empty foregroud/background
wide angle is not a good lens for landscapes t.b.h. i dont know why so many newbies think that
>>3682529no clear subject, photo is underexposed and there's a pile of garbage in the bottom left and a distracting pole near the center for the frame
>>3682532good job, you have a subject this time. but too bad composition is poor, you're not using the foreground/background/other elements to frame the subject
>>3682535the only redeemable shot, this one's not bad
>>3682536underexposed, unclear if subject is house or mountain, poor composition since tehy're fighting each other for visual attention. I know you're trying to "spice up" the mountain by adding some foreground interest (house), but the way it's composed the trees are interrupting the value that the house might add
>>3682537not bad also
>>3682543gay and cliche
>>3682812distracting foreground at bottom
>I was walking around with a 14-24 most of the time but I should use a 24-70 more next time.imagine using a wide angle lens for landscapes. No wonder why they all feel like cellphone snapshits
>>3682818not bad but lighting is not stand out enough
>>3682821>Yeah foreground interest is really the hardest thing imo to pull off.lmao this is why you don't use a wide angle lens. Stop trying to force foreground interest, if you have to look around for a garbage pile to serve as "foreground interest" then you should be recomposing it without that garbage.
