>>4046058>But USA charges more!There's none in stock on Amazon US as far as I can see, but camelcamelcamel shows it's not cost more than $225.49 in the last year+
Yet more of your disingenuous lies exposed!
>What a cope saying that a lens that costs twice as much isn't comparable, why should canon charge the same as SonyBecause that's what we're doing isn't it, comparing similarly priced lenses with similar uses? If you want to use your £400+ canon lens, does that mean I get to pick an £800 Sony lens? Why should Sony go cheaper?
>Where are you getting this info that vignette is from a corrected jpegIt matches the figures for corrected jpegs from other reviews, it doesn't explicitly state whether it's raw or jpeg even though that site usually does, sample 24mm raws are pitch black in the corners. What proof do you have it's not from the jpeg output?
>Wahhhh assume, shilling, btfo, WAHHHHHLmfao, this is hilarious. Thanks for implying that I'm so good at making Sony look good and canon look bad that I must be a paid professional.
>You're >:( b >:( t >:( f >:( o >:(Lol
>Please stop posting, you're making me look stupid because I don't have the brains to stop exposing myself as stupidI know. I know.
