Sony chads don't even have to have this argument.
https://www.lenstip.com/602.4-Lens_review-Sony_FE_40_mm_f_2.5_G_Image_resolution.htmlhttps://www.lenstip.com/620.4-Lens_review-Nikon_Nikkor_Z_40_mm_f_2.0_Image_resolution.htmlhttps://www.lenstip.com/623.4-Lens_review-OM_System_M.Zuiko_Digital_20_mm_f_1.4_PRO_Image_resolution.htmlJust so you understand that MTF charts are not equal between systems:
here's what 70lp/mm looks like from the sony over what 85 lp/mm looks like on lolympus.
>>4151312Blowing your shit way up on a what, 60, 96 ppi monitor? Is going to exaggerate "problems" severely. Instead try printing from both cameras, and you'll find something interesting
The olympus would simply produce a smaller print, and the nikon would produce a larger print. They would look about the same but you might be able to see a tiny bit of grain from the olympus. At higher ISOs the gulf grows wider, of course.
Also, an f2 lens is not an f5.6 lens because of corner sharpness. If you want to be serious... you're comparing a small center crop to the whole image circle.
