>>3986054kek
>>3986061Nice.
>>3986065>are you appreciating the scenario I've laid out in the OPYour scenario would be false if shot noise were affected by pixel density (in a pixel array).
>>3986071>>3986076>stop quoting hard data that destroys muh theories!!!lol
>>3986089>arguing that taking the same sensor but only using 25% will somehow result in an image with worse SNR. that's literally what we're arguing about right nowYes, 25% of a FF sensor will have worse SNR than the whole FF sensor. PhotonsToPhotos measures several FF sensors in FF and APS-C modes. Go ahead, look up the graphs.
