Quoted By:
Hey all. Canon user here. I've got my hands on a rabal SL1. Nothing fancy, but I'm surprised of the image quality it's gotten me. So far I've built up an array of lenses ranging from my first L being the 16-35 2.8 ii. I didn't get the f4 because even though it is more sharp the IS does nothing for me in low light such as concert venues and astrophotography. I've also got my hands on a 50mm 1.8, nothing fancy. Lastly, I have a 4.5-5.6 100-300 USM.
My question here is:
I have about $1500 USD saved up that I was planning to go towards a 1-DX. I know most of you will say it's not necessary, however, I'll argue with you that the type of photography I plan on getting in to requires the weatherproofing the 1DX offers for me such as storm timelapse photography.
That being said, with the current prices of camera bodies, my question to you guys is presented here:
Do I purchase an 85mm 1.2 lens and start saving again (by that time the 1DX price will be a little lower, and I'll have a good 135mm equivalent portrait lens in the meantime)
Thank you. I'm a faggot. Canon sucks. Sony is better. All that stuff out of the way feel free to comment down below.
In the meantime enjoy one of my most recent shots taken with my 16-35 at the widest setting (~26mm equivalent)
