>>3434613Its impressive how you for no reason assume OP is trying to be an ultra unique deep and meaningful art duke instead of just a guy that takes pics, AS HE LITERALLY SAID, going so far as to mention the fact that lots of people do this kind of thing as somehow a sign that the practice is bad
It should literally be the inverse
That there are so many results should reinforce that there are in fact people that enjoy this kind of thing
In this very thread we see people like OP's stuff, yet you seem to refuse to acknowledge that
Do you think the 700,000,000 results in google are all 14 years old edgy emos who will grow out of in a year too?
How can one be so fucking dumb, that they think that the market for pictures has the same opinions
This sounds an awful lot like you're the edgy pseudo, "my taste is the only taste, all else are fads and phases, learn the rules and never take a weird pic" nigger
