>>2585330>>2585333I'm not a serious tographer, and yes they are pretty fun. Results aren't amazing but they are interesting. I like the fisheye more than the wide angle... it's drastic enough to make the distortions permissible. The wide-angle just kinda adds a few degress tot he FOV (and some vignetting grr) but smears the image pretty bad. I can't afford real glass for awhile, so in the meantime these are fun just to take pics when i'm hanging out with friends and hiking and shit I guess.
Also I researched extension tubes and decided on the close-up lenses for some reason. Just easier and whatnot. If I don't do anyting too close or stack the lenses the results *can* be pretty ok. Oh well I guess.
