>>3048804>What camera were you using? A centre weighted meter should have given more exposure in this scene.Thanks for the detailed answer m8. I'm pretty sure it was an EOS 100/Elan. I was probably using Evaluative (the one that measures the whole viewfinder, not sure what name it's got) which I usually get away with using my dslr but clearly didn't quite work using film...
I've been messing around a bit more and came with a workflow that's giving me some pretty nice (I like them so I'm happy) colors.
Also I see that there is quite a lot of difference in how each of us has scanned my frame. For me obviously the one that looks the best is
>>3048790 the one I made since I was there and that's what things were looking like (it was -4C and about to snow like crazy, pic related). Is this usually how it's done, by eye?
