>>2954136Where's the 35mm 1.4 for fuji? You have to factor in the aperture too, so you've actually got a 35mm f2.
Then we've got the bigger issue of sensor and photosite size, if we take the 24mp xt2 and a7ii, the photosites on the sony are 134% larger, so for both images to have the same apparent sharpness, the fuji glass would need to be able to resolve 134% more detail.
Unfortunately for you the sony zeiss 35mm f1.4 is as good as 35mm lenses get.
And why would we need a crop lens? Crop is for when you need more zoom or want to take advantage of full frame lenses on tilt shift adapters.
>>2954150Ibis would mean your previous 1/60th minimum shutter speed could be taken right down to 1/5th or 1/10th of a second.
>>2954242fuji doesn't cover more individual focal lengths, you have nothing as wide as our 10mm and nothing as long as a mount pro sports lenses.
You only have 3 primes longer than 35mm, one's a 56 one's a 60...
Oh and let's remind ourselves how fucking awful your £400 fast normal holds up against canons £60 nifty fifty. Pic related.
You have no argument for crop sensors, giving inherently less sharp images until your lenses outresolve your sensors by a factor of 2 (to hit the nyquist limit).
>arguing low light between crop and ffHere's a hint, how do 135 film shots look in comparison to medium format, gimped?
>lighterNope, with battery, card and slow 35mm (sony 35 2.8, fuji 23 f2) the fuji combo weighs 17g extra. These figures get worse for your 28mm and 50mm equivalents.
>"improved with fuji too"I was talking about the xt2, you've got 3 years till your next upgrade, sony have the a9 coming next year.
>1st party flash coming soonGn50
£450
Lollllllllllllllll
>zeiss makes lenses for fujiCorrection, zeiss MADE lenses for fuji, they've since stopped and are selling old stock.
>how much does an extra 2 stops of flexibility meanArguably, quite a lot.
