>>3292067iThat's a good price for film. If you're not too attached to the images then just get them dev'd and printed if that's much cheaper for you. Then if you spot a shot or two in the prints that you want scanned you can always go back and have the negatives scanned.
Or the other thing to do is to sink ~$350 into developing gear and a scanner (or enlarger if you're than way inclined). Will be expensive to start off with but is far cheaper in the long run. It only costs me about $0.50 per roll to develop these days, and the scanning is free since I do it myself.
