>>4369769>disruptive, impolite, aggressive, and a violation of peoples essential liberties.lol
a) you are doing it wrong... actually it sounds more like you have never done it and just assume some douchebag you saw jumpscaring people with point-blank flash is the way everybody does it.
b) liberties - "thinks someone looks cool after 0.5second glance, takes photo, smiles at them, they smile too and continue on their way"... in PUBLIC PLACE
>oMg MuH LiBeRtIeS haB BeEn RayPeDYou aren't even a participant in the interaction, you dont know shit so your wailing about it like its a violent crime is simply insane.
Learn to stop letting your mind spin in devolving spirals of idiot fantasy and stop being so negative.
>>4367554>dysgenicEveryone understood what you meant, and thought no more of it....except:
>dRoNe StRiKe>NaZiDo you realise that any reasonable adult sees this kind of hypersimplified hate classification as extremely immature? Retarded even? It speaks very clearly as to your gimp-tier level of programming. It's not the good-soi thing you are conditioned to think it is.
You think you can incite violence against others simply by calling them some of your magical badwords, but this naive assumption probably means that you are the punchable face/dislikable cunt..irl, not the people you are ineffectually squealing at.
>>4369818>titties>telephoto perspective compression>lines, contrasts, common and odd objectsFeels like art. Therefore it is art to anyone who wants to say that.
>>4365454>white balanceMaybe, many of that days shots had a rusty hue. The camera is ~14 years old now too.
But she was just very black, the tint of black that makes full sun in summer australian shadows, a dress washed in UV enhancing detergents, and telstra-pink in the scene.... likely to slightly overwelm auto metering/whitebalance.
Maybe i need to always shoot EV -0.7 just for these shots, to push the image into digitals deeper dark bits, and auto-adjust everyting else in post.
