>>3561278>IT'S A CHEAP LENS!!!It's a prime stopped down.
>BUT IT'S STILL A CHEAP LENS!!!But you praise it repeatedly in other threads.
>IT MUST BE A BAD COPY!!!DPReview checks for copy variation. And doesn't Olympus make the best lenses ever?
>I HAD MULTIPLE BAD COPIES IT'S A BAD LENS EXCEPT WHEN IT'S GOOD!But aside from a decentered lens element... which is clearly not evident in the test shot...even a "bad copy" of a prime lens will be good stopped down.
>DPREVIEW IS PAID!Do you have a citation for that?
>IMAGING RESOURCE IS THE ONLY ONE THAT'S FAIR!Have you ever actually compared Imaging Resource RAWs and not in-camera sharpened and NR'd JPEGs? (Pic related.)
>DAMN YOU I SAID THEY USED A BAD COPY OF THE 45MM!!!But this is from Imaging Resource and they were using the 60mm f/2.8 macro.
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MUH OHLIMPISS!!!>DELET THIS!!!>OHLIMPISS 4EVAH!!! 