>>3733562You replied to someone else. I took that shot and didn't value the comment on distortion (there is none) enough to reply.
>>3733563Great job having a crooked Münster in the background. Now do that under the enlarger and see how long it takes.
FYI this shot shows the view from Neu-Ulm (new Ulm at Bavaria) to Ulm (at BW), so the new building should lead the view to the old church in the background. For this purpose I focused on keeping the Münster straight. Here is it at a stop underexposed.
Anyway, how do crooked lines make a point on Anon claiming HP5+ 'looks like shit' (
>>3733467)?
