>>4387305And why do they mislabel their ISOs?
Because of marketing. If you label ISO 100 as ISO 200, you are now claiming you have one more stop of dynamic range at ISO 200, because you have one less stop of noise. Because it's actually ISO 100.
it's not actually because of the sensor size, but because of the marketing practices of the brand.
Now you know way too much about why cANON is wrong when you could have just looked at these two pictures
>>4387295>>4387296And I wasted half my bandwidth and told a TA to piss off because someone was wrong on the internet and it's lunchtime
