>>4083094>quite similar at ISO 200-800 rangeAnd exposed properly, DR can also be judged by recovering details and if you go that route then K3 III loses its shit hard, which is a shame because the bodies up until the K1 were known for their excellent RAW files.
The K1 II and K3 III have been proven not as good in that regard in comparison to their predecessors, they did some fuckery with the sensors and along with NR works it seems the images fall apart when trying to push the shadows. Astronerds still use the original K1 rather than the II, to give an example.
