>>3533783>even mft and inch sized sensors are having better low light performance than ff cameras from ten years ago.That is one of the most hilarious parts to me. No one was saying the Nikon D600 was too noisy for "Professional Results" at ISO 6400 back in 2014, but gearfags will swear up and down that MFT has unacceptable noise at even ISO 3200 when it's objectively better than anything the D600 could spit out at that ISO.
>>3533754Ok, how about ISO 25600? Pic related is the flagship Nikon D850, which costs $3300, at ISO 25600 on the left. On the right is the $1500 EM1.2 only one stop behind at ISO 12800.
If you think gaining one stop of noise performance at ISO 25600 is worth $1700, be my guest.
