>>2689938The background is more interesting than the foreground which makes 50%+ of this shot pointless. Also poor focus on the lower wood grain
>>2689940Poor quality, from artifacting or from a shitty camera? Might be a good shot with detail and good light/sun position.
>>2689997Very nice, tons of dead space but for some reason it works.
>>2690084Feels flat and boring despite light being in nice positions. Not sure why your focus is on the foreground. Try playing with HDR.
>>2690117I like this but I would've waited another hour for less light, or underexposed the background a little more since there's not enough emphasis on the subject.
>>2690120This needs to be much larger or shot from a different angle
>>2690119The right side of the shot is the only thing that stays interesting.
>>2690175Technically well realized, subject is ultimately fairly boring though.
>>2690184Fun to look at, great shot, the best of the four.
>>2690193What happened to his legs? Good shot but maybe a little too harsh on the front light and nothing else in the frame to give me perspective/interest.
>>2690254Having a person in the shot ruins it, the backlighting is far too harsh and you're not even focused properly on the rod. I see what you're going for though, keep trying.
>>2690288Fairly good shot but the subject is boring. Remove the cars and shrink the frame and it may improve slightly.
>>2690310Love this one, good shot.
>>2690322Also fantastic, not even sure how you got this to come out so well
>>2690355Overexposed, bad framing.
>>2690505Fantastic location/shot but why on earth would you turn the shutter speed down so low and ruin that reflection and water? And if you're going to destroy the water then at least frame more of it out.
>>2690508>>2690510>>2690511>>2690512Bit excessive on the HDR, the third and fourth pictures are the only ones that benefit from it. Bike looks great though, good job.
